An Incredible Balancing Act, God, the Anthropic Principle and Inflation

The Standard Big Bang Cosmology (SBBC) would rank as a successful scientific theory. Yet it has some rather peculiar defects. To explain these difficulties some astronomers have introduced an even more peculiar principle - the Anthropic Principle.

The Flatness Problem

Why is the geometry of the universe almost flat? This seems like a harmless enough question. Observations, while not at all conclusive, lead us to believe that the universe is very nearly flat. This "nearness" is so unlikely that it has lead some to speculate that the universe is EXACTLY flat. This means that the density of matter is precisely the critical density that we spoke of earlier. Why? The reason is quite simple. If the universe had been any denser than the critical value than it would have collapsed back on itself before now - we wouldn't be here to wonder... On the other hand, if the earlier universe was not dense enough then the galaxies would never have formed - space would have thinned out too rapidly and again we wouldn't be here to wonder ...

 Calculations have shown that the only way for our universe to have formed and be this "close" to flatness is if the original conditions governing the formation of the universe were very precisely tuned to better than one part in 1049 ! This means that the universe must have started out close to its critical density. If it was too dense then the universe would have stopped expanding and re-collapsed: NO YOU AND ME! If it was not dense enough then the universe would have expanded too fast for stars to form: NO YOU AND ME!

Another way of putting this is that the odds of the universe starting "randomly" and ending up as we are today is about 1 in 1049 . These odds are about as good as winning 7 consecutive lotteries with single tickets each time! In fact it may even be less likely than this. If Roger Penrose is correct the odds would be more like winning 150 lotteries in row!!

The Smoothness (or Horizon) Problem

                        A related problem has, ironically to do with the back ground radiation - long considered crowning proof of the SBBC. The trouble is that the back ground radiation is too uniform. Uniformity means that the universe was at the exactly the same temperature everywhere at the end of the radiation dominated era. But, this requires that every part of the universe be able to exchange heat and reach equilibrium with every other part of the universe. The problem? By the time of recombination the universe was too large to permit this. The only way the universe could appear so smooth today is if it began in an incredibly ordered fashion which again means that the initial conditions had to be tuned to almost incredible precision.

Proof for God's Existence? or The Anthropic Principle

Yes, the initial conditions of the early universe were so unlikely that it is reasonable to believe that God must have ordered and guided the formation of the universe. It wasn't chance at all and only a designing God could have created the necessary initial conditions. Well, maybe.

 On the other hand consider this. Even as unlikely as these odds are, given enough time even the most unlikely event will occur. Another way of putting it is anything that is not absolutely prohibited must eventually happen . This is the tack that some scientists have taken. They go further to suggest that the very fact that we exist to observe this universe means that it is the only possible universe in which we could be. Infinities of universes have come and gone - ours is the only one in which we would be conscious. There is nothing at all surprising in the numbers. This is known as the Anthropic Principle .

 Which do you find most reasonable? Perhaps the point is that a proof of God's existence really seems to beg the question. Further, how do I as a Christian astronomer find my way here? If I simply assert that God created the universe I have gone no further than I was before. Of course God created the universe - but how? How does God prepare so special a set of conditions that our present universe unfolds?

The Inflationary Universe

In the late 1970's the young physicist Alan Guth heard about the flatness problem. He was researching the early history of the universe when the temperature was so extreme that all the forces and particles were essentially unified into one particle, one force. What Guth began to realize was that as the universe expanded and cooled there would be events much like phases changes in chemistry. For example, when water turns to ice a phase change occurs and the structure of the water changes rapidly. Guth hypothesized that as the universe cooled it underwent the equivalent of a phase change. A consequence of this was extremely rapid expansion of the universe from a point to the size of a grapefruit - all within about 10-35 s!! This phase has been called inflation . It very effectively solves the problem of flatness and smoothness. Prior to inflation the universe was small enough to reach thermal equilibrium. Also, any "wrinkles" or departures from flatness would be smoothed out and the overall curve of the universe would be rapidly driven down to zero. The Inflationary Model has now become an essential feature of the BBC.

The Large Scale Structure of the Universe

The Inflation Model has many successes to its credit. It solves the problem of flatness and smoothness as well as a number of more technical problems relating to the existence of certain kinds of particles. One vexing problem, however, has been a satisfactory explanation of the formation of galaxies, clusters, superclusters, walls, voids, etc. Within the past 3 years a promising theory has been put forward. While the theory is quite mathematical it does have a simple analogy. Imagine an ice cube forming. As the ice freezes it is streaked by thin lines or sheets. These are defects in the crystal structure. In the very early universe a similar process is thought to have taken place. In the mid 1990's the Cosmic Background Explorer Satellite (COBE) and more recently the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP)has succeeded in detecting the very minute deviations in isotropy of the background radiation that could be attributed to the first nascent structures of the universe. The pink "blotches" in this all sky image taken in the microwave region (after a considerable amount of image reduction) show regions that are a few micro-degrees warmer than the blue regions. We now have data that will allow us to test models of "structure formation" within the very early universe.

 

A roll-over image comparing the resolution of COBE abd WMAP

The early universe was extremely hot and perfectly symmetric. As it cooled "defects" in the structure of space appeared. Sheets of immense size and mass developed. These are believed to be very strange objects being essentially 2 dimensional or even 1 dimensional in the case of cosmic strings . Detailed calculations show that such structures could form. Furthermore, they would represent regions of strong gravitational attraction - the necessary seeds for the formation of galaxies and the other large scale structures observed in the universe. In a tantalizing way the largest structures in the universe may be the result of quantum fluctuations during the big bang. We explain the largest structures by using the physics normally reserved for a discussion of the smallest of structures!

The Big Bang

 Summary of the Evidence
 
  • expansion of the universe
  • 2.7 K background radiation
  • element abundance ratios

BB + Inflation provides interpretive framework for:

  • smoothness and flatness of universe
  • formation of large-scale structure (walls, voids, superclusters)
  • explanation of COBE and WMAP anisotropy measures

Where we now stand....

  • Universe is 13.7 billion years old (±1%)
  • First stars ignited 200 million years after the Big Bang
  • Content of the Universe: 4% Atoms, 23% Cold Dark Matter, 73% Dark Energy
  • Expansion rate (Hubble constant): H= 71 km/sec/Mpc (±5%)

Seeds: Chp18
l