Stellar Surveying - The Astronomer's Method

Ha! The heliocentric model is WRONG!!! It predicts that the earth should move and so we would see the stars from different locations during the year and thus we should see the closer stars shift back and forth. Try this with your finger. The stars don't move like this. No parallax - no heliocentrism.

WRONG!!! In 1838 the German astronomer Bessel (Struve and Henderson as well) found that 61 Cygni (a binary system of mag 5.22 and 6.02) shifted, back and forth during the year by 0.29 seconds of arc! This is a measurement that amounts to the thickness of a human hair viewed from the rear of the classroom or a penny seen from a distance of 10.7 km!! Yet this measurement (I have NO idea how he did it but hope to find out) was dramatic. He was awarded the Royal Astronomical Society's Gold Medal in 1841 and Sir John Herschel (Sir William's son) said the following:

 

I congratulate you and myself that we have lived to see the great and hitherto impossible barrier to our excursions into the sidereal universe - that barrier against which we chafed so long and so vainly - almost overleaped at three different points. It is the greatest and most glorious triumph which practical astronomy has ever witnessed

Sir John Herschel, 1841

 

.

The method of parallax is wonderfully simple. It is illustrated in the following figure (also, click here to see a simulation of stellar parallax): 

"p" is the parallactic angle which is one-half the total amount of shift that one would see in the course of 6 months. The reason that we define p in this way is to make the math very simple. It uses no more complicated math than:

d = rp

where:

If we measure d as 1 AU then the equation is even simpler:
r = 1/p

The Hipparcos satellite has increased this number dramatically over past decade to about 120 000 stars. Of this number, about 20 000 stars have parallaxes known to an accuracy better than 10%.

Example: The star 61 Cygni has a parallactic shift of 0.29". How far away is it?
Solution: Just use r = 1/p. But there's a catch (there's always a catch!) ... we must use radian measure... so...
Angle Facts
Unit Conversion
1 arc second 1/3600 degree
n arc seconds n/3600 degrees
1 degree p/180 radians
n" (n/3600)(pi/180) radians

0.29" =( 0.29/3600)(pi/180) = 0.0000014 radians We can put this into the equation to get r = 1/( 0.0000014) = 711258 AU or 700 thousand times farther away than the sun!!

The Parsec - an easier way!

Stellar distances are so enormous we need special units to describe them. We have already introduced and used the light year. Another unit that is very convenient is the parsec. A parsec is defined to be:

the distance at which an object will have a parallactic shift of 1"

If we use the parsec unit then the distance formula is as simple as it can possibly be: in words:

distance in parsecs = 1/parallax in seconds of arc

 

If we use this approach then it is easy to tell the distance to 61 Cygni. r = 1/p= 1/0.29 = 3.45 parsecs

Useful Conversions:

Practice:

  1. How far away is Capella ( p = 0.080")?
  2. What is the parallax for Aldebaran which is 60 ly away?

Proper Motion

The stars are slowly moving in a complex choreography. They move, as we shall eventually see as groups in clusters such as the Pleiades or eventually as semi-autonomous vagabonds in orbit around the galaxy. These motions are detectable and are called the proper motion of the star to distinguish them from precession and parallax. By studying the proper motions of stars astronomers are able to extend our methods of determining stellar distances. Unfortunately, time does not permit us to study these techniques in any depth.

Getting a Level Playing Field: The Absolute Magnitude Scale

Question
How bright would the sun be if it were situated at a distance comparable to proxima-Centauri?
Answer:
m = -0.22 somewhat brighter than Capella.
Question
What if Deneb were situated where proxima-Centauri is?
Answer:
m = -12.2 about as bright as the FULL MOON!!!
We define the absolute magnitude of a star as the brightness it would have if it were at a distance of 10 pc. The absolute magnitude is a meaningful measure of the intrinsic brightness of a star - the apparent magnitude is not.

The following formula combines absolute and apparent magnitudes with distance measured in parsecs:

M = m - 5 log(r/10)

where:

This formula is often re-arranged to read:

m - M = 5 log(r/10)

 

and the term m - M is called the distance modulus.
We can use a graphical approach to the distance modulus equation:

for distances less than 100 pc click here,
for distances between 100 pc and 1000 pc click here.


Example:
To see how to use this relation let's consider a star that we know (from parallax measurement p = 0.02") to be 50 pcs or about 150 ly away. If the star appears to be 3rd magnitude what is its absolute magnitude?

Solution:
Click on the graph for r < 100 pcs. The red line shows this case. When r = 50 pcs the distance modulus is 3.5. This means that m-M = 3.5. Re-arranging yields: M = m - 3.5. Since the star has an apparent magnitude of 3, M = 3 - 3.5 = -0.5.

Distance Modulus Calculators:
Click the following  icon  to open up a useful calculator that will allow you to determine distance if you know both apparent (m) and absolute (M) magnitudes for a star.

Click on the image on the right to open a graphical Flash applet that will allow you to calculate distance moduli.

Note: there is a little bug in the applet - you must move the mouse over the bottom edge of the graph to expose the control panel. WHen it open click on the magnifying glass icon on the far right side to make the graph appear.

Skill Testing Question

You observe two stars - one has an apparent magnitude of 1.2 and a parallax of 0.1" while the other has m = 3.2 and p = 0.035". Which of the two is intrinsically brightest? 
In our next lecture we will use our knowledge of distance and absolute magnitude to begin to untangle the basic properties of stars. We will aslo be introduced to the "HR" diagram - one of the fundamental developments in 20th century astronomy.
 
 
Time to take a Quiz!


Seeds: Chp 9; 172-178

Kaufmann: Chp19; 336-349